Login Broker vs Supabase

Hosted social login for developers — one script tag, one API key, six providers. Free to 100,000 MAU. Login Broker gives product teams a fast, reliable way to add authentication without building and maintaining separate integrations. Connect Google, Apple, GitHub, Microsoft, Discord, and other popular identity providers through one consistent developer experience. Create a project, add the lightweight script tag, and start accepting secure social sign-ins in minutes. The unified API handles provider configuration, redirects, sessions, account linking, and common edge cases so your team can focus on the product. It is designed for startups, SaaS companies, agencies, and independent developers who need production-ready login with minimal infrastructure. Clear documentation and simple defaults make setup approachable, while flexible settings support custom domains, branded experiences, and a smooth path from prototype to scale. Login Broker helps reduce implementation time, maintenance work, and authentication complexity. Start free with up to 100,000 monthly active users, then grow when your audience grows. No lengthy identity platform migration is required, and teams can keep their existing application architecture while adding dependable social access. Built for dependable authentication, faster launches, and happier developers.

Supabase

The open source Firebase alternative

Supabase is an open-source backend platform built on Postgres, giving a project a hosted database, authentication, file storage, edge functions, and realtime subscriptions behind one set of client libraries - without asking you to give up SQL or the ability to leave. The founding insight is that Postgres already does most of what a backend-as-a-service claims to add. Row-level security is a Postgres feature, not a Supabase one; the auto-generated REST API is derived from your schema; realtime is built on the database's replication stream. That means the product is a set of well-integrated conveniences layered over a database you could operate yourself, rather than a proprietary datastore with an API in front of it. Your data lives in ordinary Postgres tables, you can connect any SQL client, and migrating away is a pg_dump rather than a rewrite. For a startup, this resolves the usual tension in the build-versus-buy decision. A managed backend gets you to a working product in days, but historically that speed was paid for later, when the abstraction stopped fitting and there was no way out. Supabase's answer is that the escape hatch is the database itself. Auth handles email, magic links, OAuth providers, and multi-factor; storage handles uploads with the same permission model; edge functions run server-side logic close to users. Pricing is freemium with a free tier generous enough to run a real side project, then usage-based paid tiers. Because the platform is open-source, self-hosting is a genuine option rather than a marketing claim. The comparison most founders make is with Firebase, and the difference is the data model: Firebase is document-oriented and proprietary, Supabase is relational and portable. If your data has relationships - and most application data does - SQL will serve you better as the product grows. Against Neon or PlanetScale, Supabase is a broader platform rather than a pure database, which is an advantage early and a constraint if you only wanted the database. Against building on AWS directly, you trade fine-grained control for a working backend on day one. Choose it when you want to move fast without accepting lock-in as the price.